From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14807 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2009 23:12:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 14691 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jun 2009 23:12:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:12:20 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MIWCv-0000s4-H3; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:12:17 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Chris Genly CC: naesten@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Chris Genly on Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:28:21 -0700) Subject: Re: gdb.texinfo patch for -var-list-children (2) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <87iqiqzea1.wl%naesten@gmail.com> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:12:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00552.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:28:21 -0700 > From: Chris Genly > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Ah, pseudo. I could have stared at that forever and not seen it. Do > you want another patch? Is it the practice that patches become > perfect? It is customary to post here the patch that actually gets committed. But in this case, there's no need for another patch because of a single typo.