From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23813 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2009 10:01:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 23555 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2009 10:01:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:01:05 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MHxNe-0004c0-M8; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:01:02 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vladimir Prus , Chris Genly CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Vladimir Prus on Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:41:09 +0400) Subject: Re: gdb.texinfo patch for -var-list-children (2) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: Message-Id: Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:01:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00531.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:41:09 +0400 > > I suggest you use unified diffs for patches (cvs diff -u). The default "context" > format is some historically-inflicted thing that is hard to read. I'm fine with both context and unified diffs.