From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24962 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2009 00:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 24935 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2009 00:40:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:39:56 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MCjwv-0008Ef-8k; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:39:53 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Aleksandar Ristovski CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Aleksandar Ristovski on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:38:08 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/doc] ptid from core section Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: Message-Id: Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:40:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 > From: Aleksandar Ristovski > Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:38:08 -0400 > > Once BFD support is available, writing the apropriate > @code{regset_from_core_section} architecture function should be all > that is needed in order to add support for core files in @value{GDBN}. > +In cases where thread (or lwp depending on the system) numbers are not > +simply appended to appropriate @code{.reg/} > +section name, one also needs to provide @code{ptid_from_core_section_name} > +and @code{core_section_name_from_ptid} architecture functions. Thanks, this is fine with me.