From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-64119-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22683 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2009 15:33:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 22672 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2009 15:33:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:33:41 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) 	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) 	id 1MB9W2-0000JE-ME; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:33:34 -0400
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
CC: bauerman@br.ibm.com, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@redhat.com, 	drow@false.org, pedro@codesourcery.com, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <8ac60eac0905312204n358aa590mf136f6aecfe0be1e@mail.gmail.com> 	(message from Paul Pluzhnikov on Sun, 31 May 2009 22:04:55 -0700)
Subject: Re: RFC: add ability to "source" Python code
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <ud4doy981.fsf@gnu.org> <20090212062654.GG13021@adacore.com> 	 <uy6wbwfx1.fsf@gnu.org> <20090213022246.GA5401@adacore.com> 	 <utz6ywq8y.fsf@gnu.org> <20090217000746.GA3812@adacore.com> 	 <u8wo5wvkh.fsf@gnu.org> <m3vdr83izz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> 	 <20090219200536.GA25486@adacore.com> <1243828612.9045.9.camel@hactar> <8ac60eac0905312204n358aa590mf136f6aecfe0be1e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E1MB9W2-0000JE-ME@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:33:00 -0000
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

> Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 22:04:55 -0700
> From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,         Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, drow@false.org, pedro@codesourcery.com,         gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Would naming the mode 'off', 'auto' and 'on' be more consistent with
> the other settings?

I don't think "auto" and "on" fit what they will do in this situation.