From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30277 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2008 11:46:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 30269 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2008 11:46:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:46:39 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KKXMS-0004bL-7A; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:45:56 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Tom Tromey on Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:15:38 -0600) Subject: Re: RFA: Remove gdb-events Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: Message-Id: Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:46:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00382.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Reply-To: Tom Tromey > Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:15:38 -0600 > > +@deftypefun void architecture_changed (struct gdbarch *@var{newarch}) > +The current architecture has changed. The argument @var{newarch} is > +the new architecture. The last sentence should say The argument @var{newarch} is a pointer to the new architecture. Otherwise, the patch for observers.texi is OK. Thanks. And sorry for a late response (due to traveling).