From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-57283-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8491 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2008 22:29:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 8475 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2008 22:29:05 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:28:47 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) 	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) 	id 1KIWWi-0006eO-3A; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:28:12 -0400
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
CC: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <1215488044.3549.116.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from 	Michael Snyder on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:34:04 -0700)
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdbreplay V2.0
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <1214974158.3601.1582.camel@localhost.localdomain> 	 <ud4lt2a6u.fsf@gnu.org> <1215488044.3549.116.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-Id: <E1KIWWi-0006eO-3A@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:29:00 -0000
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2

> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:34:04 -0700

Sorry for the delay.  I'm traveling with low connectivity and very
little time for catching up.

> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:52 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:49:18 -0700
> > > 
> > > Here's a new contribution -- I call it gdb-freeplay, an 
> > > improved and less restrictive version of gdbreplay.  Its
> > > something I've been playing around with for some time now.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > What, nothing for the manual?
> 
> Well... er... the manual doesn't mention the old gdbreplay...

Yes, I know.

> But I don't mind writing something.  It's a deal more complex
> than the old one.  Where do you think it would fit in?

I think it should be a separate chapter.