From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30419 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2008 06:30:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 30411 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2008 06:30:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:29:51 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JoC0i-0003xG-Dv; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:29:48 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Markus Deuling CC: uweigand@de.ibm.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <480D747C.6040609@de.ibm.com> (message from Markus Deuling on Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:15:40 +0200) Subject: Re: [patch]: Fix access to SPU registers for fortran Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20080421193652.GA23498@caradoc.them.org> <200804212000.m3LK0gFL008220@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20080421202318.GB26164@caradoc.them.org> <480D747C.6040609@de.ibm.com> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:04:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:15:40 +0200 > From: Markus Deuling > CC: GDB Patches , Eli Zaretskii > > I added some lines to the documentation. > Is this ok ? Yes, thanks. > +types. Also suitable for unions. As unions aren't part of regular fortran > +this can only happen when accessing a register that uses a gdbarch-defined > +union type. "Fortran" capitalized, please, and please give me a comma between "Fortran" and "this" in the above sentence.