From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4916 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2007 16:45:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 4908 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2007 16:45:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:45:08 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HutCB-0007Xl-VR; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:44:47 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Ulrich Weigand" CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <200706031329.l53DTWKH001985@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (uweigand@de.ibm.com) Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa] [4/4] SPU enhancements: GDB/MI extensions Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200706031329.l53DTWKH001985@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:45:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:29:32 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Ulrich Weigand" > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > A cross-reference to the section you added about SPU would be useful > > here. Similarly for other MI commands that are SPU-specific. > > Like in the following version? Yes. > > Btw, I think the addition of SPU support and the change in the qXfer > > packet are worth entries in NEWS. > > OK, I'll add a NEWS entry. Thanks.