From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-39217-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17184 invoked by alias); 4 May 2005 17:43:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17123 invoked from network); 4 May 2005 17:43:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 May 2005 17:43:46 -0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DTNu5-0004ek-8C; Wed, 04 May 2005 13:43:21 -0400
To: me@cgf.cx
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20050504145535.GJ24661@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from
	Christopher Faylor on Wed, 4 May 2005 10:55:35 -0400)
Subject: Re: [RFC] fullname attribute for GDB/MI stack frames
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <01c54f57$Blat.v2.4$4c163500@zahav.net.il> <20050502204859.GA6090@nevyn.them.org> <01c54f91$Blat.v2.4$f6e0b160@zahav.net.il> <20050503034604.GA437@nevyn.them.org> <01c55017$Blat.v2.4$3cb51f20@zahav.net.il> <20050503195650.GD25356@white> <01c55025$Blat.v2.4$00e755e0@zahav.net.il> <20050503213911.GB16440@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <01c55061$Blat.v2.4$5a644e20@zahav.net.il> <20050504114821.GA27168@white> <20050504145535.GJ24661@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Message-Id: <E1DTNu5-0004ek-8C@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 17:43:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 10:55:35 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <me@cgf.cx>
> 
> Has anyone actually confirmed that gcc will put \abc or x:abc in source
> files?

I did (as I told elsewhere in this thread).