From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9075 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2004 04:01:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9056 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2004 04:01:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Aug 2004 04:01:49 -0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bxe7Z-0005zh-8E; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:01:49 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jeff Johnston CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4123B62C.6060703@redhat.com> (message from Jeff Johnston on Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:03:56 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <41191D71.60204@redhat.com> <20040811171203.GA4152@nevyn.them.org> <411A7D97.50104@redhat.com> <20040818135621.GA26257@nevyn.them.org> <4123AC6E.8000300@redhat.com> <20040818193952.GA27639@nevyn.them.org> <4123B62C.6060703@redhat.com> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:01:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:03:56 -0400 > From: Jeff Johnston > > Eli, in light of what Daniel and Andrew have said regarding the value > of having an observer, may I repost with changes and check the code in? I'm still unconvinced, but I won't veto it.