From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24510 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2002 15:27:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24466 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 15:27:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 15:27:31 -0000 Received: from 3diff by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16QVUk-0002oy-00; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:27:26 -0500 From: Brian Youmans <3diff@gnu.org> To: eliz@is.elta.co.il CC: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:49:13 +0200 (IST)) Subject: Re: More (C) tweeks for printed manual References: Message-Id: Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:27:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00417.txt.bz2 Maybe RMS just forgot to ask about including the FDL? It does need to be included. Just like when you give someone a copy of the source code you need to include a copy of the GPL, when you give someone a copy of the manual you need to include a copy of the FDL. (That is why we are not asking people to use the FDL for very short pieces of documentation - it would be silly to add a 6 or 8 page license to a very short piece of doc.) The copy of gdbmi.texinfo I looked at was the one in the 5.1.0.1 distribution. Maybe someone corrected the problem I saw with the "Invariant Sections" already? - Brian Youmans, FSF office staff