From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19076 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2015 19:15:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19066 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2015 19:15:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: DUB004-OMC2S34.hotmail.com Received: from dub004-omc2s34.hotmail.com (HELO DUB004-OMC2S34.hotmail.com) (157.55.1.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:15:54 +0000 Received: from DUB118-W14 ([157.55.1.138]) by DUB004-OMC2S34.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:15:51 -0800 X-TMN: [lZ93o+10Q3Onq9F7AVW9NSsrRaVyimmK] Message-ID: From: Bernd Edlinger To: Pedro Alves CC: GDB Patches , Doug Evans , Mike Frysinger Subject: RE: [PATCH] Enable building GDB without installed libtermcap Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <54EF5C56.9010101@redhat.com> References: <54EB4FDF.1060909@redhat.com>,<54EB513A.8050706@redhat.com> ,<54EF5C56.9010101@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00785.txt.bz2 Hi, On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:48:06, Pedro Alves wrote: > > Yes, but I think we should remove the mingw specific fallback > a bit above too. > yes, and probably these lines too: =A0 cygwin*) =A0=A0=A0 if test -d $srcdir/libtermcap; then =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 LIBS=3D"../libtermcap/libtermcap.a $LIBS" =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 ac_cv_search_tgetent=3D"../libtermcap/libtermcap.a" =A0=A0=A0 fi ;; reason: this block is never executed, because $srcdir/libtermcap points to binutils-gdb/gdb/libtermcap but it inclues ../libtermcap/libtermcap.a, which assumes binutils-gdb/libtermcap. However if libtermcap was there, it is built after gdb, so this would fail anyway. Thanks Bernd. =20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20 >From gdb-patches-return-120273-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org Thu Feb 26 19:50:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 105446 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2015 19:50:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Delivered-To: mailing list gdb-patches@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 105437 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2015 19:50:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-vc0-f174.google.com Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f174.google.com) (209.85.220.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:50:50 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id id10so4812959vcb.5 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:50:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.126.233 with SMTP id nb9mr9918562vdb.71.1424980248139; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:50:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.146.73 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:50:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150225151646.GA30181@adacore.com> References: <20130926165939.GA5440@adacore.com> <20131004073447.GB3326@adacore.com> <20150225151646.GA30181@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setting parity for remote serial From: Yurij Grechishhev To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00786.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1262 Hi Joel, Glad to hear that this patch is still needed. I believe, all questions with FSF copyright assignments had been resolved? Please, let me know what I should do to complete this contribution. Thank you WBR, Yury 2015-02-25 19:16 GMT+04:00 Joel Brobecker : > Hello, > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:34:47AM +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Thanks for your reply, Yurij. >> >> > > Any update on this patch? >> > No updates >> >> Is there anything I can do to help this patch come through? I was >> under the impression that it had stalled waiting for your assignment >> to come through. >> >> > > I don't see you on file at the FSF regarding copyright assignment. What's >> > the status on this? >> > I think, assignment/disclaimer process with the FSF is currently complete. >> >> I had actually searched the records prior to sending the question. >> Was the assignment done under a different name or maybe under a >> university or employer's name? > > This is a feature that we would like to have. Unfortunately, since > we lost contact with Yurij, unless we hear from him again, we will > ask someone at AdaCore who hasn't seen the patch to implement > a similar feature. Once we have that, we'll contribute it here. > > -- > Joel