RE: [PATCH v2 01/47] gdb, intelgt: add intelgt as a basic machine

Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2024-12-17T18:56:16Z

On Monday, December 16, 2024 8:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.12.2024 16:59, Tankut Baris Aktemur wrote:
> > Add 'intelgt' as a basic machine to config.sub.
> >
> > To: <config-patches@gnu.org>
> > To: <binutils@sourceware.org>
> > ---
> > config.sub | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/config.sub b/config.sub
> > index 2c6a07ab3c34eabed8318ec0a37c0cc23b77a63f..63ff958ec125e543674e9b261d5e5bb2fa749c4e
> 100755
> > --- a/config.sub
> > +++ b/config.sub
> > @@ -1205,6 +1205,7 @@ case $cpu-$vendor in
> > | hppa | hppa1.[01] | hppa2.0 | hppa2.0[nw] | hppa64 \
> > | hexagon \
> > | i370 | i*86 | i860 | i960 | ia16 | ia64 \
> > + | intelgt \
> > | ip2k | iq2000 \
> > | k1om \
> > | kvx \
> >
>
> Patch 3 enables ld, but I can't spot any gas enabling (sadly the cover letter
> wasn't Cc-ed to the binutils list).

Sorry, this is my bad. I'll Cc binutils in the next revision submission.
For the time being, the link to the cover letter is

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-December/214029.html

> Don't you further need to exclude gas from
> attempts of configuring?
>
> I'm also puzzled by that difference: The series supposedly is about enabling
> gdb. Why enable ld there? Just because it's (seemingly) easy?
>
> Jan

Without enabling ld, when configured as

<src>/configure --enable-targets="intelgt-elf"

'make' gives

*** ld does not support target intelgt-unknown-elf
*** see ld/configure.tgt for supported targets

Regards
-Baris