Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gerlicher, Klaus" <klaus.gerlicher@intel.com>
To: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, "Beulich, Jan" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"Tom de Vries" <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: "Jiang, Haochen" <haochen.jiang@intel.com>,
	Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	H.J.Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Subject: RE: Inconsistent usage on onebyte_modrm and twobyte_modrm table in x86 disassembler and gdb?
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:19:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM3PPFD7E67F03693D5CCD247A707920DF8E839A@DM3PPFD7E67F036.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v7mbrdqn.fsf@gentoo.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2025 10:46 AM
> To: Beulich, Jan <JBeulich@suse.com>
> Cc: Jiang, Haochen <haochen.jiang@intel.com>; Binutils
> <binutils@sourceware.org>; gdb-patches@sourceware.org; H.J.Lu
> <hjl.tools@gmail.com>; Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent usage on onebyte_modrm and twobyte_modrm
> table in x86 disassembler and gdb?
> 
> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> writes:
> 
> > On 25.08.2025 04:42, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Recently I happened to have a look at the gdb code. At gdb/amd64-tdep.c
> >> L1102 comment, it mentioned that:
> >>
> >> /* WARNING: Keep onebyte_has_modrm, twobyte_has_modrm in sync
> with
> >>    ../opcodes/i386-dis.c (until libopcodes exports them, or an alternative,
> >>    at which point delete these in favor of libopcodes' versions).  */
> >>
> >> This means the table content and usage should be the same as gas.
> >>
> >> However, when we are using the table in disassembler at opcode/i386-dis.c
> >> L9877, it is:
> >>
> >>   /* REX2.M in rex2 prefix represents map0 or map1.  */
> >>   if (ins.last_rex2_prefix < 0 ? *ins.codep == 0x0f : (ins.rex2 & REX2_M))
> >>     {
> >>       if (!ins.rex2)
> >>         {
> >>           ins.codep++;
> >>           if (!fetch_code (info, ins.codep + 1))
> >>             goto fetch_error_out;
> >>         }
> >>
> >>       dp = &dis386_twobyte[*ins.codep];
> >>       ins.need_modrm = twobyte_has_modrm[*ins.codep];
> >>     }
> >>   else
> >>     {
> >>       dp = &dis386[*ins.codep];
> >>       ins.need_modrm = onebyte_has_modrm[*ins.codep];
> >>     }
> >>
> >> It will use the very first byte of the bytecode.
> >>
> >> On the other hand, in gdb, let's take VEX prefix as example at
> >> gdb/amd64-tdep.c L1349, the logic is:
> >>
> >>   /* Skip REX/VEX instruction encoding prefixes.  */
> >>   ...
> >>   else if (vex2_prefix_p (*insn))
> >>     {
> >>       details->enc_prefix_offset = insn - start;
> >>       insn += 2;
> >>     }
> >>   else if (vex3_prefix_p (*insn))
> >>     {
> >>       details->enc_prefix_offset = insn - start;
> >>       insn += 3;
> >>     }
> >>   ...
> >>   if (prefix != nullptr && rex2_prefix_p (*prefix))
> >>     {
> >>       ...
> >>     }
> >>   else if (prefix != nullptr && vex2_prefix_p (*prefix))
> >>     {
> >>       need_modrm = twobyte_has_modrm[*insn];
> >>       details->opcode_len = 2;
> >>     }
> >>   else if (prefix != nullptr && vex3_prefix_p (*prefix))
> >>     {
> >>       need_modrm = twobyte_has_modrm[*insn];
> >>       ...
> >> }
> >> ...
> >>
> >> It will skip the VEX prefix and use twobyte_has_modrm table instead of
> >> onebyte_has_modrm[0xc4/c5] in disassembler. The table usage are totally
> >> different although the table itself is the same. It will cause the need_modrm
> >> value different eventually. For example, opcode for VPBLENDW under 128
> bit
> >> is "VEX.128.66.0F3A.WIG 0E /r ib". The need_modrm would be false in gdb
> >> since twobyte_has_modrm[0x0e] is false.
> >>
> >> Does anyone know the reason on that? It is weird to me.
> >
> > Same here; see https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2019-
> February/155347.html.
> > That patch might require re-basing and some work to be up-to-date again,
> but
> > fundamentally it still looks applicable. I don't really understand why stuff
> > like this isn't allowed in. Pedro's desire for a testcase is understandable,
> > but shouldn't block such a patch (there was a 2nd one s well) for this many
> > years.
> 
> I didn't realise a patch was rotting for this. There's Alexander's
> PR28999 (and a few other either dupes or very-related bugs) too.
> 
> While I can understand wanting a testcase, tdep is really in a sorry
> state for x86 anyway, and this clearly makes it better. Perhaps with
> Haochen's interest, we can finally get it in. But I don't see any
> specific x86 maintainers for gdb.
> 
> sam

Hi all,

FWIW I'll attach my fix for the (V)PBLENDW. It has a testcase and a unittest case. 

I believe with this there are no other instructions that would not be handled correctly.

VEX and EVEX-encoded instructions generally require a ModR/M byte, with the
notable exception of vzeroall and vzeroupper (opcode 0x77), which do not
use ModR/M.

This change sets need_modrm = 1 for VEX instructions, and adds an exception
for instructions where *insn == 0x77, following Intel's SDM.

EVEX has no exceptions and thus always sets need_modrm to 1.

Additionally, the legacy twobyte_has_modrm table cannot be used for VEX and
EVEX instructions, as these encodings have different requirements and
exceptions. The logic is now explicit for VEX/EVEX handling.

Add vpblendw to selftest amd64_insn_decode. Note there's no EVEX testcase
added here even though decoding logic for EVEX has also changed.

The Intel SDM says the following:

  1. Intel(r) 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual

  Section 2.2.1.2 - Instruction Prefixes

  "The VEX prefix is a multi-byte prefix that replaces several legacy prefixes
  and opcode bytes. The VEX prefix is not an opcode; it is a prefix that
  modifies the instruction that follows."

  Section 2.2.1.3 - Opcode Bytes

  "The opcode byte(s) follow any instruction prefixes (including VEX). The
  opcode specifies the operation to be performed."

  Section 2.2.2 - Instruction Format

  "If a VEX prefix is present, it is processed as a single prefix, and the
  opcode bytes follow immediately after the VEX prefix."

  Source: Intel(r) SDM Vol. 2A, Section 2.2.1.2 and 2.2.2 (See Vol. 2A,
  PDF pages 2-4, 2-5, and 2-7)

  2. ModRM Byte Requirement

  Intel(r) SDM Vol. 2A, Table 2-2 - VEX Prefix Encoding

  "Most VEX-encoded instructions require a ModRM byte, except for a few
  instructions such as VZEROALL and VZEROUPPER."

  Source: Intel(r) SDM Vol. 2A, Table 2-2 (See Vol. 2A, PDF page 2-13)
---
 gdb/amd64-tdep.c                              | 24 ++++++++++++++-----
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.S  | 19 +++++++++++++++
 .../gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.exp          | 20 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/amd64-tdep.c b/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
index 1adf81602b0..a273cb9594c 100755
--- a/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
@@ -1686,13 +1686,12 @@ amd64_get_insn_details (gdb_byte *insn, struct amd64_insn *details)
     }
   else if (prefix != nullptr && vex2_prefix_p (*prefix))
     {
-      need_modrm = twobyte_has_modrm[*insn];
+      /* All VEX2 instructions need ModR/M, except vzeroupper/vzeroall.  */
+      need_modrm = *insn != 0x77 ? 1 : 0;
       details->opcode_len = 2;
     }
   else if (prefix != nullptr && vex3_prefix_p (*prefix))
     {
-      need_modrm = twobyte_has_modrm[*insn];
-
       gdb_byte m = prefix[1] & 0x1f;
       if (m == 0)
 	{
@@ -1701,12 +1700,16 @@ amd64_get_insn_details (gdb_byte *insn, struct amd64_insn *details)
 	}
       else if (m == 1)
 	{
-	  /* Escape 0x0f.  */
+	  /* Escape 0x0f.  All VEX3 instructions in this map need ModR/M,
+	     except vzeroupper/vzeroall.  */
+	  need_modrm = *insn != 0x77 ? 1 : 0;
 	  details->opcode_len = 2;
 	}
       else if (m == 2 || m == 3)
 	{
-	  /* Escape 0x0f 0x38 or 0x0f 0x3a.  */
+	  /* Escape 0x0f 0x38 or 0x0f 0x3a.  All VEX3 instructions in
+	     this map need ModR/M.  */
+      	  need_modrm = 1;
 	  details->opcode_len = 3;
 	}
       else if (m == 7)
@@ -1722,7 +1725,8 @@ amd64_get_insn_details (gdb_byte *insn, struct amd64_insn *details)
     }
   else if (prefix != nullptr && evex_prefix_p (*prefix))
     {
-      need_modrm = twobyte_has_modrm[*insn];
+      /* All EVEX instructions need ModR/M.  */
+      need_modrm = 1;
 
       gdb_byte m = prefix[1] & 0x7;
       if (m == 1)
@@ -4254,6 +4258,14 @@ test_amd64_get_insn_details (void)
     = { 0x62, 0xf1, 0x7c, 0x48, 0x28, 0x81, 0x00, 0xfc, 0xff, 0xff };
   fixup_riprel (details, insn.data (), ECX_REG_NUM);
   SELF_CHECK (insn == updated_insn);
+
+  /* INSN: vpblendw -0x400(%rip),%zmm0, evex prefix.  */
+  insn = { 0xc4, 0xe3, 0x45, 0x0e, 0x25, 0x3a, 0x0f, 0x00, 0x00, 0xff };
+  amd64_get_insn_details (insn.data (), &details);
+  SELF_CHECK (details.opcode_len == 3);
+  SELF_CHECK (details.enc_prefix_offset == 0);
+  SELF_CHECK (details.opcode_offset == 3);
+  SELF_CHECK (details.modrm_offset == 4);
 }
 
 static void
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.S b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.S
index 9b6b2b1f3ed..d83eb14f777 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.S
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.S
@@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ test_rip_vex3:
 test_rip_vex3_end:
 	nop
 
+
+/* Test a VEX3-encoded RIP-relative VBLENDW instruction.  */
+	vmovsd ro_var_vpblendw(%rip),%xmm0
+
+	.global test_rip_vex3_vblendw
+test_rip_vex3_vblendw:
+	vpblendw  $0x03, var128_vblendw(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1
+	.global test_rip_vex3_vblendw
+test_rip_vex3_vblendw_end:
+	vmovdqu %xmm1, var128_vblendw(%rip)
+	nop
+
 	/* skip over test data */
 	jmp done
 
@@ -52,6 +64,10 @@ ro_var:
 	.8byte 0x1122334455667788
 	.8byte 0x8877665544332211
 
+ro_var_vpblendw:
+	.8byte 0x1122334455667788
+	.8byte 0x8877665544332211
+
 /***********************************************/
 
 /* All done.  */
@@ -67,4 +83,7 @@ done:
 var128:
 	.8byte 0xaa55aa55aa55aa55
 	.8byte 0x55aa55aa55aa55aa
+var128_vblendw:
+	.8byte 0xaa55aa55aa55aa55
+	.8byte 0x55aa55aa55aa55aa
 	.section	.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.exp
index 4ae6461fb0d..4bd9f93d8fa 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step-avx.exp
@@ -140,5 +140,25 @@ with_test_prefix "vex3" {
 	"var128 has expected value after"
 }
 
+# Test a VEX3-encoded RIP-relative instruction that was falsely
+# identified as not having a ModRM byte.
+with_test_prefix "vex3_vblendw" {
+    # This case writes to the 'var128' variable.  Confirm the
+    # variable's value is what we believe it is before the AVX
+    # instruction runs.
+    gdb_test "p /x (unsigned long long \[2\]) var128_vblendw" \
+	" = \\{0xaa55aa55aa55aa55, 0x55aa55aa55aa55aa\\}" \
+	"var128_vblendw has expected value before"
+
+    # Run the AVX instruction.
+    disp_step_func "test_rip_vex3_vblendw"
+
+    # Confirm the that the store of the vpblendw result changed
+    # ymm1 register
+    gdb_test "p /x \$xmm1.uint128" \
+	" = 0x11223344aa55aa55" \
+	"ymm1 has expected value after"
+}
+
 # Done, run program to exit.
 gdb_continue_to_end "amd64-disp-step-avx"
--


Thanks
Klaus
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Sean Fennelly, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-26  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <SJ5PPF77D28E3C228C975969E2B0BDB2853EC3EA@SJ5PPF77D28E3C2.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
     [not found] ` <92aea037-9c0e-438f-8a0a-fd52dd2df7bc@suse.com>
2025-08-25  8:45   ` Sam James
2025-08-25  9:26     ` Alexander Monakov
2025-08-25 14:33       ` Tom de Vries
2025-08-26  6:02         ` Jiang, Haochen
2025-08-26  8:19     ` Gerlicher, Klaus [this message]
2025-08-26  9:31       ` Tom de Vries
2025-08-27 10:32         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-27 12:20           ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-27 15:23             ` Schimpe, Christina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM3PPFD7E67F03693D5CCD247A707920DF8E839A@DM3PPFD7E67F036.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=klaus.gerlicher@intel.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=haochen.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox