From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32412 invoked by alias); 3 May 2010 00:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 32399 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2010 00:58:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com (HELO aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com) (143.166.82.159) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 00:58:37 +0000 X-Loopcount0: from 12.110.134.31 Received: from unknown (HELO M31.equallogic.com) ([12.110.134.31]) by aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com with SMTP; 02 May 2010 19:58:34 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [PING] [RFC] Thread debug support for NetBSD 5 Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 00:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <201005021328.o42DSlce001475@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> References: <19405.52446.728141.329821@pkoning-laptop.equallogic.com> <19408.27827.830391.509465@pkoning-laptop.equallogic.com> <19417.40044.762978.858637@pkoning-laptop.equallogic.com> <201005021328.o42DSlce001475@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: "Paul Koning" To: "Mark Kettenis" Cc: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 > I have two questions: >=20 > 1. Does the code still work on older versions of NetBSD? There isn't any released threads support for older NetBSDs that I know of. Also, NetBSD needed some work (to make the ptrace function sufficiently capable) which is in NetBSD-current, which is 5.0. =20 > 2. You could consider getting rid of the HAVE_PT_GETXMMREGS > conditionaization. That would simplify the code a bit. It would > mean mean dropping support for ancient NetBSD versions though. Ok, thanks. =20 > I didn't look too closely at the nbsd-thread.c code, but nothing > stands out as obviously wrong to me. Pedro spotted a few things there > though. Thanks. I haven't had any other feedback yet. paul