From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32634 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2003 20:25:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32625 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2003 20:25:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yeah-baby.shagadelic.org) (208.176.2.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2003 20:25:04 -0000 Received: from wasabisystems.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yeah-baby.shagadelic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693211E087B; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:25:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [rfa?] Implement ppc32 SYSV {extract,store} return value Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com To: Andrew Cagney From: Jason Thorpe In-Reply-To: <3F8714F5.2030605@redhat.com> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00377.txt.bz2 On Friday, October 10, 2003, at 01:22 PM, Andrew Cagney wrote: My apologies for not having a lot of time to keep up with this, but... > + /* For NetBSD, this is an on again, off again thing. Some systems > + do use the broken struct convention, and some don't. */ > set_gdbarch_use_struct_convention (gdbarch, > ppcnbsd_use_struct_convention); > + set_gdbarch_extract_return_value (gdbarch, > ppc_sysv_abi_broken_extract_return_value); > + set_gdbarch_store_return_value (gdbarch, > ppc_sysv_abi_broken_store_return_value); > set_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets (gdbarch, > > nbsd_ilp32_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets); on-again, off-again... which version of the compiler does which? Is this a bug in GCC 2.95.3 (which is what shipped with NetBSD 1.6)? (NetBSD 2.0 is going to ship with GCC 3.3.1.) -- Jason R. Thorpe