Re: starting gdb/mi from FE

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-06-06T17:30:44Z

On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:39:21AM -0700, Jim Ingham wrote:
> part was explicitly rejected. IIRC the argument at the time was that
> you could manage to do nested calls to set interpreter, and it was
> hard to make that work. This didn't so much bother me - people who
> taunt the software like that deserve what they get. So I've

As long as we either make it work, or make it error(), I'm happy...
though I'd have expected it to work.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery