From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31308 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2011 12:49:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 31299 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2011 12:49:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vw0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:48:50 +0000 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so4180140vws.30 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.117.66 with SMTP id kc2mr194021vdb.184.1316090930108; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:48:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.178.11 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:48:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201109061449.14666.pedro@codesourcery.com> References: <201109061449.14666.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Kevin Pouget Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] GDB checkpoint can't/shouldn't be possible with multiple threads on Linux To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00269.txt.bz2 check-in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-09/msg00087.html Thanks, Kevin On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > On Wednesday 31 August 2011 13:44:43, Kevin Pouget wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Kevin Pouget w= rote: >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Pedro Alves = wrote: >> >> > > can you rename this local as well, in line with the other >> > > local in the other function? =A0To "count", or "count_p", or somethi= ng >> > > like that. =A0Thanks. =A0(pre-approved) >> > >> > fixed with count_p, thanks >> >> my copyright assignment is now ready, so I regenerated the patch >> against the up-to-date trunk > > This was pre-approved, so you can just check it in once you have a chance. > > Thanks, > -- > Pedro Alves >