Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR python/13599
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPftXUJt7ia7YqLjOP-af_tHKbVT2sp6RQtMRK1Fu_w6BvjM9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22RaFYaB0XGxCiftTAshX1S2PGVuYaAvB6Ky45MFz6cg6Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>> This fixes PR python/13599.
>>
>> The bug is that there is no way to get the line number in the source at
>> which a symbol was defined, even though gdb tracks this information.
>>
>> This patch changes gdb.Symbol to add a new 'line' attribute.
>>
>> This requires a doc review.
>>
>> Built and regtested on x86-64 Fedora 15.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> 2012-01-31  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>
>>
>>        PR python/13599:
>>        * python/py-symbol.c (sympy_line): New function.
>>        (symbol_object_getset): Add "line".
>
> 'tis ok with me.
>
> One comment though.
> The first thing that come to mind, as a user, is "Well, if I can get
> the line number from the symbol, why do I have to look elsewhere to
> get the file name?"
> The reason is an internal gdb implementation detail that we expose in
> python. IWBN if symbol tables were more nebulous entities - we might
> want the freedom to change them a bit.  [Not that we necessarily can
> change things now, but I think it's something we should keep in mind.]

I was curious about the difference between your new method and this one:

> def whereis(arg):
>     symbols = gdb.decode_line(arg)
>     for sal in symbols:
>         if sal is not None and sal.symtab is not None:
>             print "'%s' is at %s%s, line %s" % (arg, sal.pc != 0 and "0x%x " % sal.pc or "", sal.symtab.filename, sal.line)

(I wrote this code before learning about `info line ...`)

Actually, the difference between Symbol, Symtab and Symtab_and_line is
still a bit obscure to me, I'm not sure that the documentation really
explains the meaning of these classes, but just what they do (or maybe
I missed something):

> A gdb.Symbol object has the following attributes: ...
> A gdb.Symtab_and_line object has the following attributes:  ...


Kevin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-01  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-31 22:04 Tom Tromey
     [not found] ` <CADPb22RaFYaB0XGxCiftTAshX1S2PGVuYaAvB6Ky45MFz6cg6Q@mail.gmail.com>
2012-02-01  8:32   ` Kevin Pouget [this message]
2012-02-01 16:08     ` Tom Tromey
2012-02-01 11:50   ` Phil Muldoon
2012-02-07 18:05 ` Tom Tromey
2012-02-07 18:47   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPftXUJt7ia7YqLjOP-af_tHKbVT2sp6RQtMRK1Fu_w6BvjM9g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kevin.pouget@gmail.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox