From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27212 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2011 09:40:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 27204 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Dec 2011 09:40:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:39:51 +0000 Received: by vbbfn1 with SMTP id fn1so10642048vbb.0 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:39:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.90.164 with SMTP id bx4mr13318388vdb.128.1324978791181; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:39:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.190.72 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:39:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111224135611.GA6131@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20111224135611.GA6131@host2.jankratochvil.net> From: Kevin Pouget Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] Fix gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.exp new FAIL on x86_64-m32 [Re: [RFC] Python Finish Breakpoints] To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00836.txt.bz2 On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:54:47 +0100, Kevin Pouget wrote: >> Great! I'll fix this last bits and commit it in the next few days > > +Continuing. > +process 23029 is executing new program: /bin/echo > +warning: Selected architecture i386:x86-64 is not compatible with reported target architecture i386 > +Architecture of file not recognized. > +(gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.exp: catch out of scope after exec > > On x86_64 with -m32 testcases compilation. > > OK to check in this patch? it makes sense to me, and it also removes an unnecessary dependency with /bin/echo thanks for catching that, Kevin