From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31287 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2019 16:30:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31275 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2019 16:30:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-18.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mail-oi1-f196.google.com Received: from mail-oi1-f196.google.com (HELO mail-oi1-f196.google.com) (209.85.167.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:30:51 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 16so1764740oiq.6 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:30:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tNO3N4WUUEoHuMmqEt2b61Bgijl8mKoLdoxKxmDTFhE=; b=jI+CQfJBmLwoGBccYnj4TR78uBweLdEkrYEc71Nr8DW3ec4FPHxEbWwhj6u4g2b/b2 xBoQLA6g468dF3swZeZJ2bq4tEY8w2X1IJCo29xM9xbcHjfnIM/o8iJvo6AYk0wFsz9E fqNhnQ5sSVrdZ43RghT8I0nMZ169GJ9ov1b0fIqna341mdqYprtF4UI+6DY8NXWkTX/h i8gm+5GZVIdXkBHPkCjzUQ7qknAuiM888Z6X+qBUEvJkFU/3UP7bdFW+8Terj9bxkXxx qKtGZc8CIBw9Q9ggKJKMBfbyk8kAWHqB9xDWS3HLTynIfpPEfxf3gARSEaHdzgbIsxuj MRFA== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190819032918.3536-1-sergiodj@redhat.com> <87wof9nu65.fsf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87wof9nu65.fsf@redhat.com> From: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" Reply-To: Christian Biesinger Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve ptrace-error detection on Linux targets To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: Ruslan Kabatsayev , GDB Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00413.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 8:47 AM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > I'm > also concerned that it's unreasonable to expect users to have > libselinux-devel (on Fedora) installed. I'm confused, why would users have to have the -dev version installed? Can't you just dlopen("libselinux.so.1") and it'll work fine without the -dev package? Christian