From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25374 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2014 16:44:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25357 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2014 16:44:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-yk0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-yk0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-yk0-f170.google.com) (209.85.160.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:44:46 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 19so494360ykq.1 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.17.197 with SMTP id j45mr4084416yhj.49.1414514684374; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.140.214 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <544F925C.20408@redhat.com> References: <1412848358-9958-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <1412848358-9958-2-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <544F925C.20408@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13 v2] Introduce current_lwp_ptid From: Doug Evans To: Pedro Alves Cc: Gary Benson , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00782.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 10/09/2014 10:52 AM, Gary Benson wrote: >> This commit introduces a new function, current_lwp_ptid, that >> shared Linux code can use to obtain the ptid of the current >> lightweight process. > > OK. Hi. The name bothers me enough to speak up. I'm ok with lwp being a member of ptid, but we're essentially replacing "thread" with "lwp". Is there a particular reason current_lwp_ptid is chosen over current_thread_ptid?