From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10493 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2013 17:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10478 invoked by uid 89); 17 Nov 2013 17:03:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f172.google.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-wi0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 17:03:44 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id en1so1025173wid.11 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 09:03:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.182.47 with SMTP id eb15mr13862905wic.51.1384707814354; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 09:03:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.37.73 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 09:03:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52864DFD.7060408@redhat.com> References: <87bo1mwvqg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <52853D8A.5070908@redhat.com> <5286078F.8090700@redhat.com> <52864DFD.7060408@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 17:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Allow CLI and Python conditions to be set on same breakpoint From: Doug Evans To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon , eliz@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00442.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 11/15/2013 03:54 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > >> That's really just the "It's more useful to combine them as &&" view >> (which I agree is a good point). > > I'm afraid I'm confused. Were you asking for something else? I can't > really understand whether it was something like that you were asking for, > or something else, whatever it would be. I feel something is getting > lost in translation, sorry about that. :-( No worries. >> Same thing can apply to other functionality implemented as a Python >> breakpoint with "stop". > > WDYM? This sentence really confuses me. :-( What "thing"? > >> I can think of a couple of other ways to achieve it, but && makes it easy. I just meant I can imagine adding a cli condition to other python-conditioned breakpoints.