Re: automated testing comment [Re: time to workaround libc/13097 in fsf gdb?]

Ulrich Weigand
2014-09-24T15:23:39Z

Andreas Arnez wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23 2014, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> > I think it'd be fine to send the periodic email results/alerts/whatever to:
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testresults/
> >
> > That list hasn't been active in a while, but it's still alive, afaics,
> > and the point of that list was to collect auto testers' test results.
>
> Interesting. Even before I started working on GDB, Andreas Krebbel had
> set up a bot that sends test results to a different list, and we're
> still continuing to do so:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/
>
> Knowing now that there's also gdb-testresults, I wonder whether that
> ever was a good choice. We could certainly change that, so gdb-testers
> is freed up for discussions like this one ;-)

Well, I guess that would be because the main web page:
https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/mailing-lists/
says:

gdb-testers
is a list for the announcement of development snapshots and the reporting of test results.

and does not mention gdb-testresults at all.

I think we should agree on one of them, and document it on the web page.

Bye,
Ulrich

--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com