From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 913 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2014 08:36:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 853 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2014 08:36:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-yh0-f47.google.com Received: from mail-yh0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-yh0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:36:18 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z6so4799218yhz.6 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 01:36:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.62.130 with SMTP id y2mr2161907yhc.158.1401784576730; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 01:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.150.70 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 01:36:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <538D8822.2030404@redhat.com> References: <20140602172105.GC30686@adacore.com> <538CB897.6050703@redhat.com> <538D8822.2030404@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gdb-7.8 branching status update From: Doug Evans To: Pedro Alves Cc: Joel Brobecker , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Keith Seitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 06/03/2014 09:22 AM, Doug Evans wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > >>> I think the break-interp.exp crashes should be a blocker too: >>> >>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00731.html >>> >>> Also, I've now noticed that running the testsuite against >>> gdbserver has several regressions compared to a month or >>> so ago. :-/ >> >> I'm not sure this is a blocker, but I've started to notice gdb segvs >> in corefile.exp. >> vdso target sections are not removed when a new core is loaded, and >> gdb is referencing memory from an already-freed bfd. >> At any rate I'm going to file a pr tomorrow. > > That's sounds just like the break-interp.exp crashes mentioned above. > Markus followed up already (silly archives don't cross the month > boundary), but I haven't managed to reply yet, still busy with > the software step stuff. It is indeed.