From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10253 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2015 06:12:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9946 invoked by uid 89); 5 Apr 2015 06:11:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qc0-f175.google.com Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-qc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 05 Apr 2015 06:11:31 +0000 Received: by qcrf4 with SMTP id f4so2338913qcr.0 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 23:11:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.80.176 with SMTP id c45mr10717249qgd.101.1428214272872; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 23:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.119.10 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 23:11:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150403071147.GM22171@vapier> References: <1427692153-12656-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20150403003913.GF22171@vapier> <20150403071147.GM22171@vapier> Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 06:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: d10v: link in missing testsuite From: Doug Evans To: Hans-Peter Nilsson , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 02 Apr 2015 23:16, Doug Evans wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > obnoxiously, this crappy framework supports parallel test running while dejagnu >> > does not. i'm not sure if there's any way to make the dejagnu do parallel ... >> > it's really really painful for some targets like frv & bfin which have hundreds >> > of tests. >> >> Maybe mimic what gdb does for parallel testing? > > my vague recollection is that gdb has sharded the exp files into arbitrary sets > so as to get some level of parallelism -- it's still at the exp level, and the > individual tests in a single exp are run in serial. is that accurate ? > -mike Yes. If there is otherwise only one .exp, one thing one could do is generate the .exp's for each shard.