From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-118562-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9423 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2014 21:04:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 9408 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2014 21:04:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f182.google.com
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 21:04:04 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h11so4839783wiw.3        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:04:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.61.168 with SMTP id q8mr26517438wjr.53.1419109441808; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.132.70 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:04:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <83k31mqeoa.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <yjt2y4qrlqwa.fsf@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>	<CADPb22SwQGcJPQFsPy0w1EOurknejRDa1pPHB8KxRarbu1jY8g@mail.gmail.com>	<m3oaqybvq0.fsf_-_@sspiff.org>	<83d27esisa.fsf@gnu.org>	<CAP9bCMTemYD6-X55OMacphFY6PcAan8Vr9E_Rh43KN=x4_NB7Q@mail.gmail.com>	<83k31mqeoa.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 21:04:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAP9bCMQWV4LRP+sxLfCkqBCj2e4qwiqJsxnrfDf=CyOgcac0wg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] symbol lookup cache
From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:14:39 -0800
>> From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>>
>> > Btw, I wonder if this should be a user option, not a "maint" option.
>> > The heuristics used to determine the cache size tend to be wrong in
>> > some rare corner cases, so letting the user override this should be a
>> > good thing, I think.
>>
>> The thought is the fewer knobs the user needs the better,
>
> We are way past the point where this ideal was achievable.  You can
> stop worrying about that.  With the gazillion knobs we have already,
> one more doesn't change anything.

There isn't so much an ideal as a process that should be followed.
I still want to vet every new knob that I feel needs vetting.