From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14587 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2014 17:23:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14573 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2014 17:23:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-yk0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-yk0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-yk0-f171.google.com) (209.85.160.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:23:57 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 142so3281888ykq.2 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:23:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.112.141 with SMTP id e135mr8672734ykb.5.1415985835126; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.81.68 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:23:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y4rfjm9h.fsf@codesourcery.com> References: <87d29cvqfu.fsf@codesourcery.com> <87y4rfjm9h.fsf@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] Rewrite lookup_static_symbol to use gdbarch routine From: Doug Evans To: Yao Qi Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00329.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > Doug Evans writes: > > Hi Doug, > Sorry for the delayed response. > >> 2014-11-08 Doug Evans >> >> PR symtab/17564 >> * gdb.base/symtab-search-order.exp: New file. >> * gdb.base/symtab-search-order.c: New file. >> * gdb.base/symtab-search-order-1.c: New file. >> * gdb.base/symtab-search-order-shlib-1.c: New file. > > These new .c files need copyright headers. These files are so trivial, I left them out. [The .exp file *does* have a copyright header.] I know the contribution checklist page mentions always adding them, even if the GNU standards only require them for legally significant headers. It's not clear that that is intended to apply in particular cases such as these. [I can add them, but establishing some clarity would be nice.]