From: Abhijit Halder <abhijit.k.halder@gmail.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implementation of pipe to pass GDB's command output to the shell.
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 06:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOhZP9xjEiKv62=f2FXFeKKgR+NZeR12pCZQmx9bL4tdS18P4A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3d3avgytx.fsf@redhat.com>
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior
<sergiodj@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey Abhijit,
>
> Thanks for keep trying to push this upstream.
Thanks for your encouragement. I would love to see this feature in
next GDB release!
> Only a few comments.
>
> Abhijit Halder <abhijit.k.halder@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +#if defined (__MINGW32__)
>> +# define DEFAULT_SHELL "cmd.exe"
>> +# define OPTION_TO_SHELL "/c"
>> +#else
>> +# define DEFAULT_SHELL "/bin/sh"
>> +# define OPTION_TO_SHELL "-c"
>> +#endif
>
> As far as I have researched, all bash-compatible shells accept `-c' as a
> parameter, and all of them interpret this parameter in the same way
> (i.e., "execute this command"). However, and I am not sure this is
> something we should worry about or not, there might be other shells
> around which do not support `-c', or expect something else. I don't
> know if a check is worthwhile in this case.
Actually I am not aware of this. But does GDB support such shell? If
yes, then ofcourse we should put a check. Please comment further.
>
>> +/* Structure to encapsulate all entities associated with pipe. */
>> +
>> +struct pipe_obj
>> +{
>> + /* The delimiter to separate out gdb-command and shell-command. This can be
>> + any arbitrary string without containing any whitespace. There should not
>> + be any leading '-' in the delimiter. */
>> + char *dlim;
>
> I believe this can be declared as const, right? Same thing for
> `gdb_cmd' below. Unfortunately, `shell_cmd' cannot be declared const
> for now because is is using `skip_spaces', which does not accept a
> `const char *' as argument.
>
> Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.
I was very much tempted for making this as const char * and that's why
submitted the patch in hurry!
Actually pex_run expects argv to be char * const *. I was about to ask
this question whether this is required? Can't we change the prototype
of pex_run? Regarding use of shell_cmd here, we can typecast that
thing. Only bottleneck is pex_run. There also typecast may work,
atleast for compilation, but this can give runtime error in case we
don't treat argv inside pex_run as an array of const string.
Thanks,
Abhijit Halder
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-08 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-03 17:04 Abhijit Halder
2012-01-06 18:11 ` Abhijit Halder
2012-01-07 18:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-01-08 6:57 ` Abhijit Halder [this message]
2012-01-08 7:17 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-01-08 7:27 ` Abhijit Halder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOhZP9xjEiKv62=f2FXFeKKgR+NZeR12pCZQmx9bL4tdS18P4A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=abhijit.k.halder@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox