From: Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson@tallertechnologies.com>
Subject: Re: [PING][RFC][PATCH v2] Python API: add gdb.stack_may_be_invalid
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOKbPbY24zgvHdmAYQvR6H=sCsF6ixzwvwdbhPpBkcdcsMotiw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201411071727.sA7HRNIQ007851@d03av02.boulder.ibm.com>
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Martin Galvan wrote:
>
>> +stack_is_destroyed (gdb_py_ulongest pc)
>> +{
>> + return gdbarch_in_function_epilogue_p (python_gdbarch, pc);
>> +}
>
> Just one comment here: python_gdbarch isn't really correct here.
> If you have a platform that supports multiple architectures, then
> you really should use the appropriate gdbarch for PC.
Agreed. I used python_gdbarch because it's used all over the API, so I
thought I could use it in here.
> Ideally, the Python interface should carry enough information to
> determine the appropriate gdbarch, e.g. by operating on a Frame
> instead of a plain PC value.
If I understand correctly, using a Frame would require the program to
be already running by the time we call the API function, which isn't
really what we want.
> If that isn't possible, one fall-back might be to look up the
> symbol table from the PC, and use the associated objfile arch.
I'll look into this. Thanks a lot!
--
Martín Galván
Software Engineer
Taller Technologies Argentina
San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5
Córdoba, Argentina
Phone: 54 351 4217888 / +54 351 4218211
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-07 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 13:32 Martin Galvan
2014-11-07 17:09 ` Pedro Alves
2014-11-07 17:18 ` Martin Galvan
2014-11-07 17:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-11-07 17:37 ` Martin Galvan [this message]
2014-11-12 15:55 ` Martin Galvan
2014-11-12 17:06 ` Doug Evans
2014-11-12 17:20 ` Pedro Alves
2014-11-12 17:26 ` Martin Galvan
2014-11-12 17:32 ` Doug Evans
2014-11-12 17:24 ` Martin Galvan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOKbPbY24zgvHdmAYQvR6H=sCsF6ixzwvwdbhPpBkcdcsMotiw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com \
--cc=daniel.gutson@tallertechnologies.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox