From: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Match instruction adjusts SP in thumb
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANu=DmhEQLVB3YNjjH-3TTNm4_LkzoVecFpKzZRCQ4rxUtizsQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404367792-23234-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>
On 3 July 2014 07:09, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> This is a refactor patch, that moves matching instructions adjusting
> SP into a new function, thumb_instruction_restores_sp. The second
> call to thumb_instruction_restores_sp in thumb_in_function_epilogue_p
> is a little different from the original. The original code matches
> 'POP <registers> without PC', but thumb_in_function_epilogue_p matches
> 'POP <registers> (with and without PC)'. However, GDB found one
> instruction about return and is scanning the previous instruction,
> which should be an instruction about return too, so the code change
> doesn't affect the functionality.
>
> gdb:
>
> 2014-07-02 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
>
> * arm-tdep.c (thumb_instruction_restores_sp): New function.
> (thumb_in_function_epilogue_p): Call
> thumb_instruction_restores_sp.
> ---
> gdb/arm-tdep.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
This patch looks good to me.
> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> index 0fc7fc1..153ef42 100644
> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> @@ -685,6 +685,17 @@ thumb2_instruction_changes_pc (unsigned short inst1, unsigned short inst2)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Return 1 if the 16-bit Thumb instruction INSN restores SP in
> + epilogue, 0 otherwise. */
> +
> +static int
> +thumb_instruction_restores_sp (unsigned short insn)
> +{
> + return (insn == 0x46bd /* mov sp, r7 */
> + || (insn & 0xff80) == 0xb000 /* add sp, imm */
> + || (insn & 0xfe00) == 0xbc00); /* pop <registers> */
> +}
> +
> /* Analyze a Thumb prologue, looking for a recognizable stack frame
> and frame pointer. Scan until we encounter a store that could
> clobber the stack frame unexpectedly, or an unknown instruction.
> @@ -3257,14 +3268,10 @@ thumb_in_function_epilogue_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
> found_return = 1;
> else if (insn == 0x46f7) /* mov pc, lr */
> found_return = 1;
> - else if (insn == 0x46bd) /* mov sp, r7 */
> - found_stack_adjust = 1;
> - else if ((insn & 0xff80) == 0xb000) /* add sp, imm */
> - found_stack_adjust = 1;
> - else if ((insn & 0xfe00) == 0xbc00) /* pop <registers> */
> + else if (thumb_instruction_restores_sp (insn))
> {
> found_stack_adjust = 1;
> - if (insn & 0x0100) /* <registers> include PC. */
> + if ((insn & 0xfe00) == 0xbd00) /* pop <registers, PC> */
> found_return = 1;
> }
> else if (thumb_insn_size (insn) == 4) /* 32-bit Thumb-2 instruction */
> @@ -3317,11 +3324,7 @@ thumb_in_function_epilogue_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
> insn = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 2, byte_order_for_code);
> insn2 = extract_unsigned_integer (buf + 2, 2, byte_order_for_code);
>
> - if (insn2 == 0x46bd) /* mov sp, r7 */
> - found_stack_adjust = 1;
> - else if ((insn2 & 0xff80) == 0xb000) /* add sp, imm */
> - found_stack_adjust = 1;
> - else if ((insn2 & 0xff00) == 0xbc00) /* pop <registers> without PC */
> + if (thumb_instruction_restores_sp (insn2))
> found_stack_adjust = 1;
> else if (insn == 0xe8bd) /* ldm.w sp!, <registers> */
> found_stack_adjust = 1;
> --
> 1.9.0
>
--
Will Newton
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-03 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-03 6:11 [PATCH 0/4] Fix gdb.trace/entry-values.exp fails in thumb mode Yao Qi
2014-07-03 6:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] Stop prologue analysis when past the epilogue Yao Qi
2014-07-03 8:39 ` Will Newton
2014-07-11 13:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-07-03 6:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] Match instruction adjusts SP in thumb Yao Qi
2014-07-03 8:35 ` Will Newton [this message]
2014-07-11 13:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-09-24 12:56 ` Yao Qi
2014-07-03 6:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] Fix gdb.trace/entry-values.exp for thumb mode Yao Qi
2014-07-07 15:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-07-08 8:53 ` Yao Qi
2014-07-03 6:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] Restrict matching add/sub sp, #imm Yao Qi
2014-07-03 8:31 ` Will Newton
2014-07-07 1:38 ` Yao Qi
2014-07-11 13:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-07-11 13:49 ` Yao Qi
2014-07-11 7:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix gdb.trace/entry-values.exp fails in thumb mode Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANu=DmhEQLVB3YNjjH-3TTNm4_LkzoVecFpKzZRCQ4rxUtizsQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=will.newton@linaro.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox