From: Luis <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>
To: Ezra Sitorus <ezra.sitorus@arm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] gdb/doc: Document AArch64 FPMR support
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:38:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANnS9rsOaS_xKaN3Mdiz9kaH_dCh8kaETN8G--oPJwkc1h7TAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRIgoeAd-0IdlUze@D2G2X7XGD1>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1119 bytes --]
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025, 17:28 Ezra Sitorus <ezra.sitorus@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2025 at 08:15:04PM +0000, Luis wrote:
>
> > I have no further comments on this one. Once Eli is happy with the
> > documentation changes, please push the series. If you don�t have commit
> > access yet, I can do that for you.
> >
>
> Just to double check, are we treating commit access to binutils the same as
> for gdb? If they're different then I only have access to binutils.
>
They are the same. If you have commit access to binutils, then you have it
for gdb as well.
> Am I right in thinking also that each patch requires an 'Approved-By' (and
> 'Reviewed-By' as well for the news/doc patch) line at the end of the commit
> message? What happens if this isn't added?
>
Yes. I've given approval for all the non-documentation ones. Eli approves
the docs, but he may have given a Reviewed-By because the docs potentially
contain arch-specific things.
If so, I'm ok with the docs too.
Thanks!
Approved-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>
> Ezra
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2266 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 15:16 [PATCH v4 0/6] gdb/aarch64: Support for FPMR Ezra.Sitorus
2025-10-31 15:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] gdb/aarch64: Enable FPMR for AArch64 in gdb on Linux Ezra.Sitorus
2025-10-31 15:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] gdbserver/aarch64: Enable FPMR for AArch64 in gdbserver " Ezra.Sitorus
2025-10-31 15:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] gdb/aarch64: signal frame support for fpmr Ezra.Sitorus
2025-10-31 15:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] gdb/aarch64: core file support for FPMR Ezra.Sitorus
2025-10-31 15:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] gdb/aarch64: Tests for fpmr Ezra.Sitorus
2025-11-09 20:11 ` Luis
2025-10-31 15:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] gdb/doc: Document AArch64 FPMR support Ezra.Sitorus
2025-10-31 16:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2025-11-09 20:15 ` Luis
2025-11-10 12:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2025-11-10 17:28 ` Ezra Sitorus
2025-11-14 7:38 ` Luis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANnS9rsOaS_xKaN3Mdiz9kaH_dCh8kaETN8G--oPJwkc1h7TAw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luis.machado.foss@gmail.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=ezra.sitorus@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox