From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13761 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2014 19:42:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13643 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2014 19:42:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f42.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f42.google.com) (209.85.218.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:42:35 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id v63so3765712oia.29 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:42:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KLXB6IqDY5+aMcnx2PZKl9cCn8EgYA/nAzAC5y0qKbE=; b=PveC5yF7tE5aSXZbSXpJnWw6wE7kX2n/+/rU6KhxuKS3+gRPXMMG7js2YHQrp1NuQb GAOghrhrvir94AkCRur3GP11W3/buN3Gd8TLRP/r+xG2kLKxFxoF9Nli+TVf4++uZ/Qg K2otyYwZbqAabdDNIMJzaDMo+rkmOQc57XOwLTR6Z8301RJeGK5O1KH63S+sPBMAOVc/ fKMViHTMscIECIVMWGPaK/2riuCtTtF2COfNfYxDl6CuqDOVjB31SA93yOx3JVt70meW QAs2XyWiO5GZkYpnxkRH5uZcLd5BRZnv0dOI108Ol7KtjHVM3G23QeMsgF2T6wa7vJ26 4a2A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcnQrt4P5SgRkFrYtJ2zoEpM/xzf9XCqIUE8YUNgpgJXsuIMIubWLTxL1Kqv4k8Bvw/DDJ X-Received: by 10.60.98.105 with SMTP id eh9mr4848790oeb.56.1409600553983; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:42:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.140.40 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87a96m8x0w.fsf@codesourcery.com> References: <1401898871-2270-1-git-send-email-omair.javaid@linaro.org> <87a96m8x0w.fsf@codesourcery.com> From: Omair Javaid Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Process record and reverse debugging support on aarch64-linux To: Yao Qi Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 On 30 August 2014 08:41, Yao Qi wrote: > Omair Javaid writes: > >> These patches have been tested on aarch64 foundation model as well as ha= rdware >> board in native and remote configurations. >> >> gdb.reverse Testsuite Results >> >> (AARCH64-Native Configuration) >> gdb.reverse testsuite: 2273 Pass 51 failures >> >> (AARCH64-Remote Configuration) >> gdb.reverse testsuite: 2273 Pass 51 failures > > The result looks good, but gdb.reverse/*.exp can't cover some > instructions, such as advance simd instructions. IWBN to add some arch > specific tests in gdb.reverse/, so that we can be more confident. x86 > and amd64 have already had some arch specific tests under gdb.reverse. I agree that currently we cannot test full instructions coverage but there are so many permutations for each instruction that adding these tests dont full fill a cost vs benefit for now. I have marked this task in my future todo list. > > -- > Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)