From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10395 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2011 04:50:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 10386 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2011 04:50:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f54.google.com) (209.85.161.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 04:49:58 +0000 Received: by mail-fx0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 4so325861fxe.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.127.195 with SMTP id h3mr2833226fas.135.1310618998120; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:49:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.121.140 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:49:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110713171250.GA24201@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110707091911.GA8747@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110713171250.GA24201@host1.jankratochvil.net> From: Hui Zhu Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA/tracepoint] Make GDB can work with some old GDB server To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches ml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2 Thanks Jan. Best, Hui On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:12, Jan Kratochvil w= rote: > On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:39:42 +0200, Hui Zhu wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 17:19, Jan Kratochvil = wrote: >> > gdb/ >> > 2011-07-07 =A0Jan Kratochvil =A0 >> > >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Work around kgdb. >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* remote.c (remote_get_trace_status): New variable ex. = =A0Put >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0remote_get_noisy_reply into TRY_CATCH. =A0Call exceptio= n_fprintf for it. >> Cool. =A0This one is more better. =A0I have reverted my patch. >> >> Suggest this patch can check in to both 7.3 and trunk. > > As Pedro is probably not going to review it till 7.3 and the patch looks = safe > enough to me and having no impact on FSF gdbservers checked it in: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-07/msg00131.html > 7.3: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-07/msg00132.html > > > Thanks, > Jan >