From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5611 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2013 07:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5584 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2013 07:29:15 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-oa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.219.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:29:09 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l10so5454166oag.17 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:29:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.162.67 with SMTP id xy3mr16829388oeb.26.1374218942405; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:29:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.116.101 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:28:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87hafsc7cd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <51D2E749.9020604@codesourcery.com> <51D4030F.6070000@codesourcery.com> <51D42272.20209@codesourcery.com> <87r4f6gxfn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87hafsc7cd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 15692 -dprintf-insert does not accept double quotes To: Tom Tromey Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches ml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu writes: > > Hui> With "call" or "fprintf". > Hui> The dprintf is directly outputted by inferior. So the string is: > Hui> "foobarbazqux" At foo entry > > Hui> But with others, the dprintf is outputted by GDB. So the string is: > Hui> ~"\"foobarbazqux\" At foo entry\n" > > Hui> That is why I use different $foobarbazqux. > > Ah, ok, that makes sense. The patch is ok. > > Tom Checked in http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-07/msg00090.html Do you think this patch is OK for 7.6 branch? Thanks, Hui