From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-100442-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31569 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2013 02:30:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 31559 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2013 02:30:20 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.219.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:30:19 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id g12so2091079oah.24        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.60.119.69 with SMTP id ks5mr3077616oeb.36.1365733817798; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.13.133 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51667633.4050800@redhat.com>
References: <CANFwon3OdcsC3PQRwteYPKiBYFFKGPcOfMVcc4Fx8XdjZ=-pQw@mail.gmail.com> <515B1DF7.3090705@redhat.com> <515EF6A3.2080704@redhat.com> <CANFwon2UZwnHqCuEtSbSz6z82tr2HciU0QfiQS2dacFdFcvMFg@mail.gmail.com> <CANFwon11DSoU5jiHX4G7RGuxBOZRaXD6Cth6Ob3X_Z0-TgnPXw@mail.gmail.com> <5162D6A9.2070706@redhat.com> <CANFwon3rTwU1AkmeWAoHJZLH=DFrwMzbazK06M5UgBbSn7ZJ2A@mail.gmail.com> <51640391.2040801@redhat.com> <CANFwon0Dmnsq50NgQ6BrPNVA5uQnEgUmsksr2SODBHp7A60ZBw@mail.gmail.com> <CANFwon19-Mk3tEejLC-hoQcFLqzcY-6-2Fw0vRYPCfYmbSquvQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130411012601.GH24389@adacore.com> <51667633.4050800@redhat.com>
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CANFwon3TLx7b4nb+OdqfdS99uG7OXt6BJJfhKnLp6oUp_dVr0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix dprintf work not right if it is pending
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>, 	Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>, gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2

Checked in to http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00113.html

Best,
Hui

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/2013 02:26 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00097.html
>>> This is a bug fix.  Can I check it in to 7.6 branch?
>>
>> Not sure if the patch is considered safe enough, but it should only
>> affect dprintf, so no objection. Pedro, would it be OK with you?
>
> Yes, I think it's safe enough to put it in 7.6.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Pedro Alves
>