From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25429 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2012 01:43:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 25420 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2012 01:43:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:43:02 +0000 Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so100961wib.12 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.95.137 with SMTP id dk9mr786193wib.1.1340329379556; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:42:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.122.193 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:42:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FE32CC9.4050708@redhat.com> References: <58272362.Fy9KhpX3fQ@qiyao.dyndns.org> <4FE32CC9.4050708@redhat.com> From: Hui Zhu Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] add testsuite for for backtrace commands with tfile to test the tfile memory read To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00677.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 06/21/2012 12:15 PM, Hui Zhu wrote: > >>> > >>> > AFAIK, in tfile.exp, trace file is generated by tfile.c and GDB only = consumes >>> > these trace files (basic.tf and error.tf) for test purpose. >>> > >> Thanks for your help. >> Post a new version according to your comments. >> >> Thanks, >> Hui >> >> 2012-06-21 =A0Hui Zhu =A0 >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 * gdb.trace/tfile.exp: Add new test for backtrace commands >> =A0 =A0 =A0 with tfile to test the tfile memory read. > > > How was this tested? > > -- > Pedro Alves ?