From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-92416-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16151 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2012 07:39:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 15983 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2012 07:39:20 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 07:39:07 +0000
Received: by wefh52 with SMTP id h52so2630033wef.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.24.68 with SMTP id s4mr16535832wif.4.1340523546631; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.122.193 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FE4353E.2090009@redhat.com>
References: <CANFwon3yijJE2S55JQg+qMLepVBOyvzBc40vrtN4aV4YcE4fvw@mail.gmail.com> <58272362.Fy9KhpX3fQ@qiyao.dyndns.org> <CANFwon24zFVKxaouACOS=XANFpaZYRHJNyPsomV5OqTS2bfisw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE32CC9.4050708@redhat.com> <CANFwon0xaF7pDJQ3p-7+3sC0qHL6mDuHVh_fseLjSXUC+MMY6w@mail.gmail.com> <4FE4353E.2090009@redhat.com>
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 07:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CANFwon0=WpGA=VUzZBt0ieui6kWt63AFBtKLf+gwYAKJNZfcxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add testsuite for for backtrace commands with tfile to test the tfile memory read
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00749.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 02:42 AM, Hui Zhu wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2012 12:15 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AFAIK, in tfile.exp, trace file is generated by tfile.c and GDB only=
 consumes
>>>>>> these trace files (basic.tf and error.tf) for test purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>> Post a new version according to your comments.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hui
>>>>
>>>> 2012-06-21 =A0Hui Zhu =A0<hui_zhu@mentor.com>
>>>>
>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 * gdb.trace/tfile.exp: Add new test for backtrace commands
>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 with tfile to test the tfile memory read.
>>>
>>>
>>> How was this tested?
>
>
>> ?
>
>
> $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS=3D"--target_board=3Dnative-gdbserver tfile.exp =
-v"
> ...
> Skipping tfile.exp because of no fileio capabilities.
> ...
>
> --
> Pedro Alves

This is because:
if [target_info exists gdb,nofileio] {
    verbose "Skipping tfile.exp because of no fileio capabilities."
    continue
}

So to use this test, need remove "set_board_info gdb,do_reload_on_run 1"

Thanks,
Hui