From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19852 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2012 17:10:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 19843 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Apr 2012 17:10:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-ee0-f41.google.com) (74.125.83.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:10:18 +0000 Received: by eeke53 with SMTP id e53so2878328eek.0 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:10:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.21.148 with SMTP id j20mr877033ebb.158.1335028208511; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.178.8 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:10:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F916F9E.6040209@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] MIPS/GDB: Fix the handling of MIPS16 thunks From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Richard Sandiford Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00713.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > [Cc-ing Daniel for the question below.] > >> > + =A0/* macro/2005-03-31: This hack skips over MIPS16 call thunks as >> >> >> Eh, that long? =A0Might want to update that date to the check in date, >> or drop it. =A0Otherwise it's just useless, IMO. > > =A0Yes, sigh... =A0And fair enough :) -- I'll tweak the date. =A0The comm= ent > might need updating once new GCC's unwind information Richard mentioned > has been tested. > > =A0There's another note, that is even older, by Daniel -- Daniel, would y= ou > mind if I updated the date on your note to the check in date too -- IOW, > do you continue to stand by it? It's all the same to me. I haven't thought about that note since I wrote it in 2004... I wasn't even at CodeSourcery yet. --=20 Thanks, Daniel