From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29065 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2013 22:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29054 invoked by uid 89); 28 Apr 2013 22:59:36 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mail-ia0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-ia0-f174.google.com) (209.85.210.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:59:36 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h23so5144555iae.33 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:59:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.134.196 with SMTP id pm4mr6282477igb.93.1367189974840; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.100.206 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:59:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fvyek9ec.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <1366812163-27865-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <87wqrrn7ki.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fvyek9ec.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix display of structures/bitfields in register description. From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: "Tedeschi, Walfred" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00855.txt.bz2 They have a different header because they're supposed to be embedded in things that run on the target which are not necessarily GPL-compatible. I figured out with the FSF what an appropriate notice would be for that case. I'd generally rather we use that notice for all target XML files, even in the testsuite, to prevent someone copying the GPL'd version into something by accident - not a big deal, though. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Walfred> Copyrights: > Walfred> I took a look on several xml files and all of them had the same > Walfred> copyright I have used. Though, would you recommend to use the > Walfred> common GPL header? > > I don't know why the other .xml files have this other header. > However, seeing as the new file is in the test suite, I think the plain > GPL comment is preferable. > > Tom -- Thanks, Daniel