From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20964 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2012 02:06:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 20943 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2012 02:06:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 02:06:05 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id fl17so2164914vcb.0 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:06:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.35.171 with SMTP id i11mr6511588vdj.14.1350785164833; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.146.138 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:06:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121021015636.GD3050@adacore.com> References: <20121020234741.GA3626@gmail.com> <20121021015636.GD3050@adacore.com> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 02:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [7.5] PATCH: PR backtrace/14646 [x32] backtrace doesn't work From: "H.J. Lu" To: Joel Brobecker Cc: GDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2 On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> This patch backports the fix from trunk to 7.5 branch. Tested on >> Linux/x86-64 and Linux/x32. OK to install? > [...] >> PR backtrace/14646 >> PR gdb/14647 >> * i386-tdep.h (gdbarch_tdep): Remove sp_regnum_from_eax and >> pc_regnum_from_eax. >> * i386-tdep.c (i386_gdbarch_init): Don't use sp_regnum_from_eax >> nor pc_regnum_from_eax. >> * amd64-tdep.c (amd64_x32_init_abi): Don't set sp_regnum_from_eax >> nor pc_regnum_from_eax. > > I'm sorry to say that I am not comfortable at all with this going > in the 7.5 branch. If Mark is super confident, then OK, but this is > touching sp/pc handling for all x86 and x86-64 targets. And I don't > think that the issue this patch is fixing is that critical. > This patch reverts the changed made on 7.5 branch, which brings 7.5 branch back to 7.4 branch. It should be 100% safe. -- H.J.