From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-97107-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 778 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2012 17:44:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 697 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2012 17:44:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CP
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-qa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:44:27 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id o19so2588392qap.0        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:44:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.74.198 with SMTP id w6mr7304695qev.57.1355766266167; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.12.210 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:44:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m3txrkshiv.fsf@redhat.com>
References: <m3k3shv0g5.fsf@redhat.com>	<CAMe9rOrPzqxx=sZh_jDywEiN5LHcRzx6ZOrtGdPt2UFswr4LxA@mail.gmail.com>	<m3txrkshiv.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:44:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqQG8aT3pTeSWfCORCTmk1ys_6PnOaZdi_kH+tc+ztguQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 01/02 v2] Refactor PRPSINFO handling on Binutils
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: Binutils Development <binutils@sourceware.org>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, 	Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00580.txt.bz2

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior
<sergiodj@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Monday, December 17 2012, H. J. Lu wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior
>> <sergiodj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> +      if (bed->elf_machine_code == EM_X86_64)
>>> +       {
>>> +         prstatusx32_t prstat;
>>> +         memset (&prstat, 0, sizeof (prstat));
>>> +         prstat.pr_pid = pid;
>>> +         prstat.pr_cursig = cursig;
>>> +         memcpy (&prstat.pr_reg, gregs, sizeof (prstat.pr_reg));
>>> +         return elfcore_write_note (abfd, buf, bufsiz, "CORE", note_type,
>>> +                                    &prstat, sizeof (prstat));
>>> +       }
>>> +      else
>>
>> When will elf_i386_write_core_note be called for
>> x32 process?
>
> Ops, sorry, that code sneaked in apparently.  Here's the new version of
> the patch.
>

Can you create a git GDB branch for me to try?


-- 
H.J.