From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30376 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2012 16:42:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 30178 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2012 16:41:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-qc0-f182.google.com) (209.85.216.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:41:46 +0000 Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so1336068qcs.13 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.135.78 with SMTP id m14mr1442289qct.129.1340383305198; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.192.129 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120622163224.GJ2799@adacore.com> References: <20120511181737.GP29339@adacore.com> <20120611153435.GH2687@adacore.com> <20120621202023.GE2799@adacore.com> <20120622144641.GA4254@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120622163224.GJ2799@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Branching time + 1 week (was: "Re: Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release)") From: "H.J. Lu" To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00715.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Joel Brobecker wro= te: >> Added two patches but those seem to be done although still discussed wit= h Eli: >> >> =A0 * [Jan] auto-load safe-path: Permit shell wildcards >> =A0 =A0 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-06/msg00700.html > > Do I understand correctly that the first patch would have no impact > if we adopted the (rather-large-but-what-can-we-do) gnulib import? > If that's correct, we could move this patch off the critical path. > >> =A0 * [Jan] -iex and -ix: Execute them _after_ gdbinits >> =A0 =A0 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-06/msg00549.html > >> A week seems OK to me. > > OK, let's see where we are at on Wed. > There are 3 small x32 patches pending review: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-06/msg00664.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-06/msg00667.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-06/msg00666.html --=20 H.J.