From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3164 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2012 16:27:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 3150 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Apr 2012 16:27:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-qc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:27:33 +0000 Received: by qcsd16 with SMTP id d16so570963qcs.0 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:27:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.86.208 with SMTP id t16mr2766902qal.16.1335284852508; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.136.69 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:27:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120410202953.GA23862@intel.com> <201204171143.q3HBh9LV021759@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PATCH: Also check for `movl %esp, %ebp' for x32 From: "H.J. Lu" To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00796.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:30 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Mark Kettenis = wrote: >>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:29:53 -0700 >>> From: "H.J. Lu" >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> X32 may use `movl %esp, %ebp' in prologue. =A0This patch checks it for >>> x32. =A0Tested on Linux/x86-64. =A0OK for trunk? >> >> Sorry, but I'm not sure it is a good idea to mix ABIs in the code like >> that. =A0Up until now, I've made a conscious attempt to keep the i386 >> and amd64 ABIs seperated out as much as possible. =A0Can you post a >> complete diff of the -tdep.c related changes to support x32 in GDB, >> such that I can judge where this is heading? > > Here is the complete x32 GDB patch: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-04/msg00476.html > Hi Mark, Have you looked at my change? Thanks. --=20 H.J.