From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90505 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2018 15:05:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 90485 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2018 15:05:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-oi0-f52.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f52.google.com) (209.85.218.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:05:56 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u141-v6so19542656oif.1 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:05:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=awPIXr08O13GZplJwXALuWBJY6YYBSgzRlGFoP7UFdc=; b=dLOfix2EAvaUEHOhWpxxq6F0kO6a0GB/Uvgd9JdaXoxfFDKeBLt7AgYVPnbKy7vKJ5 Xq5YxumD8BgHy52MbOdOK28Yz+qG2NU8orBMiyy3nDvitrUrCCS2JkWmZhE3UFzejlB9 kI473m04vdiX0NEwx4xs/J8WELooi8bi0U0ljN3s7k65AgLaCqdH/sc8z7MzCJyyx1l2 LjWq6qkgRCs8GieBDiVDdOxTOr4ybgUPRita1WY4EtKdbhs5ttL6cHfZ9X6COk0tcGjD 8wVSLneKYLUdM1DVGO69GknRiOpnCY1ooSVHACzfkIfPZekzaTpyLm5qzq2aR20NwOFR /hBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAbWqQ/NOtgbE1ZUB1MkIWKiIWLpFV3wXmkh+0UhQC/5y5IN+c8 ZoLBfrO0pnzCBKQzI52oGH0JusDrnfiIPYS24jmCSQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx491eSlqpth46B5Bd65pF+gZ6K2n9/r3z5x678lNu0afteciiXECKeacm+Da+AoRqU9n2a9k28QeXJ7eE2t1xXk= X-Received: by 2002:aca:ea46:: with SMTP id i67-v6mr9704548oih.316.1522854354920; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:05:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.190.152 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:05:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180404144342.vxvb7u52s2zz33eh@adacore.com> References: <20180404114219.GA439@intel.com> <20180404144342.vxvb7u52s2zz33eh@adacore.com> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH, committed] i386: Clear vex instead of vex.evex To: Joel Brobecker Cc: GDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I'd like to backport it to GDB 8.1 branch. Is it OK for gdb-8.1-branch? > > Looks good to me, but in that case, create a GDB PR that points > to the binutils one, and set the Target Milestone to 8.1. This is > to make sure all changes made on the 8.1 branch since the 8.1 > release are easily trackable by everyone. > Done: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23028 -- H.J.