From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28180 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2013 18:27:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28166 invoked by uid 89); 19 Dec 2013 18:27:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oa0-f42.google.com Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f42.google.com) (209.85.219.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:27:51 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i4so1650023oah.15 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:27:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.183.3.102 with SMTP id bv6mr2488132obd.18.1387477669207; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:27:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.105.174 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:27:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131219182206.GI3493@adacore.com> References: <20131219175908.GH3493@adacore.com> <20131219182206.GI3493@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GDB 7.7 branching on Monday? From: "H.J. Lu" To: Joel Brobecker Cc: GDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00793.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I have 4 patches I like to see in GDB 7.7: >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00309.html >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00307.html >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00313.html >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00310.html > > I'll need a little more from you. What's your estimate for getting them As you said, they are small changes. But I don't know when Mark will have time to review them. > in, and what are the consequences of not having them for 7.7? Reverse debugging won't work for x32 without them. > Here is what I propose: We go ahead with the branch on Monday. > Looking at the patches, they seem to be relatively simple enough > that they should be good candidates for backporting to the branch > if they get approved after Monday. > It sounds good to me. BTW, what can/should GDB community do to reduce review time for x86 specific changes, especially those small changes. Thanks. -- H.J.