From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-88480-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22987 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2012 21:49:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 22976 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2012 21:49:35 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f182.google.com) (209.85.216.182)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:49:22 +0000
Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so1129691qcs.13        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of hjl.tools@gmail.com designates 10.224.27.20 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.27.20;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of hjl.tools@gmail.com designates 10.224.27.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=hjl.tools@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=hjl.tools@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.27.20])        by 10.224.27.20 with SMTP id g20mr7863931qac.39.1330724961844 (num_hops = 1);        Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:49:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.27.20 with SMTP id g20mr6611060qac.39.1330724961740; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.144.207 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:49:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F4BD008.1060909@redhat.com>
References: <4F21A489.2080200@redhat.com>	<CAMe9rOp2x+pEJ5fcu5ipdQ=V-WwzQZp3zzZ83nCLiDQmihxMcA@mail.gmail.com>	<4F4BD008.1060909@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:49:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOoWUmONdsjxc5G6LobB8pngBo4G5nrpJeuYHYjx6L_Lhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AVX and unavailable registers, fix system-gcore.exp
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 06:04 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> 2012-01-26 =A0Pedro Alves =A0<palves@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* i387-tdep.c (i387_supply_xsave): If we have an xsave b=
uffer, and
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the register state is clear, supply explicit zero, inste=
ad of
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0marking the register unavailable.
>>
>> This fixes 7.3/7.4 regression:
>>
>> http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13766
>
> Thanks for confirming. =A0Since you agree with the patch, I'll check it i=
n in
> a few days unless I hear otherwise. =A0I'll post a separate RFC patch pro=
posing
> to remove the NULL REGS handling:

Has this fix been checked in?

Thanks.

H.J.