From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82387-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8118 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2011 17:22:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 8100 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2011 17:22:06 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:21:30 +0000
Received: from hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.7])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p6JHLTaf011844	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:21:29 -0700
Received: from yxk30 (yxk30.prod.google.com [10.190.3.158])	by hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p6JHKaJQ012859	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:21:27 -0700
Received: by yxk30 with SMTP id 30so2935773yxk.11        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.40.21 with SMTP id s21mr6914850ybj.430.1311096087418; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.48.15 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALoOobMZEbQDQOWM4iPOP9ORm5DLDaLoqZXO5YYHaf+hV+DS6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110715180748.A0390190BC2@elbrus2.mtv.corp.google.com> <m3k4bf7byo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CALoOobMZEbQDQOWM4iPOP9ORm5DLDaLoqZXO5YYHaf+hV+DS6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:44:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CALoOobM_+CJi3fWNk7C0K2ApRS76uRo9r6scDYCQnJHf8VSkBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Make target_read_string faster over high-latency links.
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00482.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov
<ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, you are suggesting a new packet, e.g.
> =A0qStr {addr},{maxlen}
> in response to which gdbserver will read up to either terminating NUL,
> or maxlen.

Ping?

Tom, is that what you had in mind?

Thanks,
--=20
Paul Pluzhnikov