From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3236 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2012 09:08:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 3219 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2012 09:08:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_YM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:08:16 +0000 Received: by wibhm14 with SMTP id hm14so1190354wib.12 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:08:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.101.170 with SMTP id fh10mr25732562wib.0.1340010495018; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.235.140 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:08:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FD0AF8C.2040908@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile.in includes linux-record.c to be common for all arch. (arm-reversible>phase-3) From: oza Pawandeep To: Matt Rice Cc: Yao Qi , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00569.txt.bz2 please ind the latest patch which includes compilation of linux-record for ARM. diff -urN orig/configure.tgt new/configure.tgt --- orig/configure.tgt 2012-06-18 12:36:47.274501400 +0530 +++ new/configure.tgt 2012-06-18 12:31:47.335501400 +0530 @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ arm*-*-linux*) # Target: ARM based machine running GNU/Linux gdb_target_obs="arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \ - solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o" + solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o linux-record.o" build_gdbserver=yes ;; arm*-*-netbsd* | arm*-*-knetbsd*-gnu) ok to check in ? Regards, Oza. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:13 PM, oza Pawandeep wrote: > ok. It is clear now. > shall incorporate linux-record where Yao suggested. > > Regards, > Oza. > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Matt Rice wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:20 AM, oza Pawandeep wrote: >>> ok. sure will add it there as it is not currently linking. >>> but on the contrary 'record.o' is also under the same section >>> COMMON_OBS, which is also not required where no record support. >>> hence it is confusing. >> >> I think that because record.o implements gdb commands, we want >> commands to be available universally >> e.g. we want an error that support for a command is not available in a >> build of gdb, rather than 'Undefined command.' >> >> where linux-record appears to be plumbing, thus not necessary.