From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16754 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2011 05:28:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 16744 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2011 05:28:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:28:19 +0000 Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so1504559wyg.0 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:28:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.74.197 with SMTP id w5mr937040wiv.25.1320816498602; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:28:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.102.133 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:28:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <998639.46560.qm@web112516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <321260.58442.qm@web112504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1316327455.23344.YahooMailNeo@web112509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1316404058.27177.YahooMailNeo@web112502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1318650316.91503.YahooMailNeo@web112508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : From: oza Pawandeep To: Tom Tromey Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petr_Hluz=EDn?= , paawan oza , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , chandra krishnappa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 Thanks Tom, Petr and Yao for your comments. I will be reintroducing assert_not_reached. apart from that some unanswered questions of Petr and Yao as below. Petr >> is the code integrated to gdb 7.3 ? Oza >> not yet, what I meant was, the patch could be directly applied on gdb-7.3. Petr >> what about making opcode and other global variable to local variable. in phase 3 ? Oza >> yes, would like to take it in phase 3. Yao >> some gdb.reverse tests are failing; are you planning to address those ? Oza >> I ahve changed the code after that to soem extent, and more over I am waiting for Chandra K to respond on his test case matter. please let me know apart from that If any question remained unanswered. next mail will contain the latest patch. Regards, Oza.